<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motley Fool&#8217;s Hidden Gems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/</link>
	<description>....Real Reviews of Trading Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:06:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradingsystemreviews.net/?p=48#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Motley Fool is good, however, like everyone else, they have bad picks. The difference is that they are honest and straightforward, admitting their mistakes and underperformers. So many of these financial newsletters only post their big winners, and leave the losers to fade from memory.

The one issue I have with Motley Fool is the price. I would not pay more than the $150 per year they charge (and trust me, most of them charge much more than that!) but it is borderline as to whether it is worth it for this price.&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Overall Rating&lt;/label&gt;: 5&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Price&lt;/label&gt;: 3&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Ease of Use&lt;/label&gt;: 7&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Performance&lt;/label&gt;: 6&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motley Fool is good, however, like everyone else, they have bad picks. The difference is that they are honest and straightforward, admitting their mistakes and underperformers. So many of these financial newsletters only post their big winners, and leave the losers to fade from memory.</p>
<p>The one issue I have with Motley Fool is the price. I would not pay more than the $150 per year they charge (and trust me, most of them charge much more than that!) but it is borderline as to whether it is worth it for this price.
<ul>
<li><label>Overall Rating</label>: 5</li>
<li><label>Price</label>: 3</li>
<li><label>Ease of Use</label>: 7</li>
<li><label>Performance</label>: 6</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd P</title>
		<link>http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradingsystemreviews.net/?p=48#comment-33</guid>
		<description>It is hard to make money with this they always recommend two per month and in order to get the rate of return that they are getting you must buy every stock that they recommend each month. They have quite a few losers, but some of the winners are big ones that wipe out your losers so if you just pick and choose one of there recommendations once in a while it becomes a tough task! So if you buy two stocks per month that means 24 stocks after one year! Now you become a mutual fund because you own so many stocks! 
I&#039;ve been a &lt;a href=&quot;http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/&quot; title=&quot;Reviews of Motley Fools Hidden Gems&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hidden gems&lt;/a&gt; member for two years now and I have probably just broke even! I would not recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/&quot; title=&quot;Reviews of Motley Fools Hidden Gems&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hidden gems&lt;/a&gt; unless you have a lot of money to play with. Also, the russell 2000 small cap index is really stuggling in this market invirement and all &lt;a href=&quot;http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/&quot; title=&quot;Reviews of Motley Fools Hidden Gems&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hidden gems&lt;/a&gt; are small cap stocks so good luck&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Overall Rating&lt;/label&gt;: 6&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Price&lt;/label&gt;: 5&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Ease of Use&lt;/label&gt;: 3&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;label&gt;Performance&lt;/label&gt;: 6&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to make money with this they always recommend two per month and in order to get the rate of return that they are getting you must buy every stock that they recommend each month. They have quite a few losers, but some of the winners are big ones that wipe out your losers so if you just pick and choose one of there recommendations once in a while it becomes a tough task! So if you buy two stocks per month that means 24 stocks after one year! Now you become a mutual fund because you own so many stocks!<br />
I&#8217;ve been a <a href="http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/" title="Reviews of Motley Fools Hidden Gems" rel="nofollow">hidden gems</a> member for two years now and I have probably just broke even! I would not recommend <a href="http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/" title="Reviews of Motley Fools Hidden Gems" rel="nofollow">hidden gems</a> unless you have a lot of money to play with. Also, the russell 2000 small cap index is really stuggling in this market invirement and all <a href="http://tradingsystemreviews.net/stocks/motley-fools-hidden-gems/" title="Reviews of Motley Fools Hidden Gems" rel="nofollow">hidden gems</a> are small cap stocks so good luck
<ul>
<li><label>Overall Rating</label>: 6</li>
<li><label>Price</label>: 5</li>
<li><label>Ease of Use</label>: 3</li>
<li><label>Performance</label>: 6</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
